But it would be fun to be in the annuals of history as such or similar. I would not want to be the next ping of death discovery person. Minwin would help up poor xp users run abit more reliably. What if a processor chjip company was able to caculated hashes in one clock cycle? Or switching portions of the calling library were at least coded into the microcode of new processors? You see how big the problem can get. Which is why I cannot wait until minwin is released into the wild. What if a undiscovered bug in User interface fix messed with Nvidias Chipsets? The problem grows in porpotion adding new demension when you are trying to address a specific code base such as Dynamic RMS. What if the hot fix they introduced messed up specialized installations from Via? A minority but growing base of Installations out there.
You cant just through another patch into the mix with out considering the internation languages base and such. Look at your windows update log and see hopw many rules WSUS must go through in updating a system. So review isnt not going to be quick unless they simply remove the offending patch and add a new on afwards.
This is not quite a round table of review but s stringant process Microsoft puts it self through. Internally reviewing the Sp3 Ready to release to the Update portion of Microsoft. as recently updated in the announcement why Sp3 was delayed/ *Either removing the conflict KB but also provifing a proper fix path*ģ. A Hot fix enabling usage of Sp3 is working properly. For example how many installations of Office 98 still are installed out there? *Probably not as many as used to be but this is an example* Good reason to at least be some what more current then people get use to.Ģ. Not every one updates there versions of software. To properly id the various versions of DRMS. Update does not offer Sp3 to the Dynamic RMS system and causing loss of data. This is the release to manufactor version. Evning Kui the version reffered to is the 5512 RTM with the RTA bits not removed.
0 kommentar(er)
